Categories / avelino/awesome-go / evidence
A community-curated, category-organized index of Go frameworks, libraries, and tools serving as a discovery front door for the Go ecosystem.
This audit's judge read a single 7.9k-token evidence dossier, compiled mechanically under per-section budgets. Below: each section, what went in, and what was cut. Citations on the audit page resolve here.
| # | Section / contents | Mode | Spent / budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| [19] | Vitals + README (distilled) | SECTION | 4.0k / 4.0k |
| [1] | README.md · distilled: badges/TOC stripped | DOSSIER | 4.0k |
| [2] | Structure (dir-aggregated) | SECTION | 2.0k / 2.0k |
| [20] | Health + Static digest | SECTION | 563 / 2.0k |
| [3] | (github api) | PROBE | 282 |
| [4] | (static analysis) | PROBE | 282 |
| [21] | Manifests + lockfiles + CI (verbatim) | SECTION | 760 / 1.2k |
| [5] | go.mod | DOSSIER | 190 |
| [6] | .github/workflows/check-for-spammy-issues.yml | DOSSIER | 190 |
| [7] | .github/workflows/tests.yaml | DOSSIER | 190 |
| [8] | .github/workflows/pr-quality-check.yaml | DOSSIER | 190 |
| [22] | Probe answers | SECTION | 472 / 1.5k |
| [9] probe-deps[10] probe-license[11] probe-ci[12] probe-claim-1[13] probe-claim-2[14] probe-claim-3[15] probe-claim-4[16] probe-claim-5[17] probe-claim-6 | |||
| [23] | Coverage notes (what was cut & why) | SECTION | 47 / 400 |
| [18] | (composer) | DOSSIER | 47 |
| 94 files mapped · 0 complete, 0 whole-function · 9 probes · degraded: router-embeddings(lexical-only) | 7.9k / 15k cap | ||
Raw signals behind the scores. Source tags: COMPUTED derived from the clone · API GitHub/registry data · JUDGE model estimate
Every judgment on the audit page, mapped to what backs it.
| Claim | Backed by | Kind |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution PRs are gated by an automated quality-check CI workflow rather than mandatory human review. | manifests-ci health-static | OBSERVATION |
| 178,732 stars, one of the most-starred repositories in the Go ecosystem. | vitals-readme | MEASUREMENT |
| 29% of open issues are stale beyond 180 days. | health-static | MEASUREMENT |
| Only 5% of sampled merged PRs carried at least one review. | health-static | MEASUREMENT |
| README badge/Slack-link claims traced to no substantive misrepresentation; nothing overclaimed beyond standard badges. | probe-claim-1 probe-claim-4 | VERIFICATION |
| CONTRIBUTING.md states a formal quality bar (5-month repo age, license, go.mod, SemVer release, test coverage) for new entries. | structure | OBSERVATION |
How much of the repository this audit actually covered, who probably wrote it, and how heavy it is — informational, never part of the grade.
structure mapped: 94 files · dossier: 7903 tok · complete files: 0 · whole-function: 0 · probes: 9
No complete generator source was reviewed to assess the repo's own authorship; sampled linked-entry descriptions show repetitive templated marketing phrasing, but that reflects submitters, not the list repo itself.